Skip to main content

Can bulls see red? How cattle see color

Yes, cows and bulls see red light, but probably not as the vivid color we see. They have two types of cone (the color-sensing cells of the eye) instead of our three, and in the model red loses most of its hue and differs from green mostly by being darker; calves in one test still told red lights from green ones. Point your camera at something red, or open a photo or video, to see it approximately as cattle do. Drag the line to compare.

Colors computed from the cattle's two cone peaks. Also blurred to the cattle's sharpness of vision: 1.3 cycles per degree (one cycle is a dark and a light stripe), taking the long side of the picture as about 70°, a phone camera's view. A phone camera and screen add their own color shifts.

Make a card of your photo for all animals

Check one color

You #D7263DCattle #6B6B36

The cones compared with ours

300400500600700
Cattle: S 450 nm, L 554 nmHuman (dashed): S 420 nm, M 534 nm, L 563 nmWavelength in nm along the bottom. Curves: how strongly each cone pigment absorbs light of each wavelength, peak set to 1 (Govardovskii template). Pigment only: filters in front of the cones, such as the lens or the oil droplets of birds, are not included.

Two cones instead of three

Jacobs, Deegan and Neitz (1998) measured the cones of cattle, goats and sheep with electroretinogram flicker photometry and found two cone mechanisms in each species. Across the three species the short-wave cone peaks at about 444 to 455 nm and the long-wave cone at about 552 to 555 nm. Each species has the basis for dichromatic color vision. Human eyes have three cone types, peaking at about 420, 534 and 563 nm (Bowmaker and Dartnall, 1980).

The abstract of the study gives these ranges for all three species together. The chart uses the middle of each range, 450 and 554 nm; we have not seen separate values for cattle alone.

Red and green to a bull

A bull's long-wave cone responds to red light, but with one cone in that part of the spectrum red and green can give a similar color signal. The table runs a few pairs through the same model as the simulator and gives the color difference (ΔE 2000) for a person and for the cattle model: the smaller the number, the harder the pair is to tell apart. On the scale we use across this site, below 3 is a close match, 6 or more is a visibly different color, and 10 or more is clearly different. In the model red and green lose their difference in hue; what remains is mostly lightness, the red looking darker. Blue against green stays far apart in the model, yet calves in the test by Phillips and Lomas (2001) had limited ability to tell blue from green (see the questions below): the model and the behavior do not fully agree. The swatches are illustrative colors, not measured fabrics.

The cone studies say what a bull can tell apart, not what makes it charge. Why bulls react in a ring is a question about behavior that these sources do not answer.

Red cape and green pasture

YouΔE 70CattleΔE 15

Red cape and sand arena

YouΔE 38CattleΔE 27

Blue bucket and green pasture

YouΔE 60CattleΔE 67

Yellow ear tag and gray wall

YouΔE 30CattleΔE 30

How the simulator works

The simulator is built from the cattle's own cone peaks (about 450 and 554 nm, the middle of the ranges). For each color it estimates how strongly it would excite each of the two cones, using the pigment template of Govardovskii and colleagues (2000) and daylight (CIE D65), and shows a color that excites them in the same way. The cone signals weigh the light by its energy; a cone counts photons, and weighting by photon count instead would shift some shown colors slightly, by up to about 16 of 255 in one color channel by our check. The shown colors lie on a yellow–blue axis plus lightness, the same plane that Viénot, Brettel and Mollon (1999) use for people with two cones, so colors that give the cattle the same pair of cone signals come out identical. It is an approximation: the eye's lens is left out, each color's spectrum is a guess from its screen color, and the picture is blurred to the animal's visual acuity, as explained below. Everything runs on your device: the camera picture, photos and videos are not uploaded.

How sharp is their vision?

Rehkämper and Görlach (1998) trained three adult dairy bulls to tell a black disc from a black ring with a white center, seen from at least 1.5 m. The bulls still noticed a white center 1 cm across, which the authors give as a visual angle of 23 minutes of arc. As stripes that is about 1.3 cycles per degree (our conversion: 30 ÷ 23). A review by Adamczyk and colleagues (2024) gives 1.3 to 2.5 cycles per degree for cattle, from this study and an earlier one with heifers.

The simulator blurs the picture to 1.3 cycles per degree, the most of the five animals. We read only the summary (abstract) of the Rehkämper and Görlach paper; the review we read in full.

How the blur is made: the simulator follows AcuityView, the method of Caves and Johnsen (2018). Fine detail is faded along a bell-shaped curve that leaves about 3% of the contrast at the animal's acuity limit, and coarse shapes and colors stay. A picture does not say how wide the scene was, so the simulator assumes that the long side of the picture covers about 70°, the view of a typical phone's main camera (the iPhone 16 main camera is 26 mm in 35 mm terms, about 69° across). If you zoomed in or cropped, the scene was narrower and the animal would see it blurrier than shown. The blur stands for the sharpest part of the eye only; the rest of the animal's view is not modelled.

How Cattle See Color: questions

Can bulls see red?
They see red light, since their long-wave cone responds to it, but with two cone types they are not expected to tell red from green by hue the way we do. Cattle have two cone types, peaking near 444–455 nm and 552–555 nm (Jacobs, Deegan and Neitz, 1998), not three. Behavioral tests are less clear-cut. Phillips and Lomas (2001) first set red, green and blue lights to look equally bright to calves; a new group of calves then told red from green in 89% of choices and red from blue in 82%, but had limited ability to tell blue from green. In an earlier test by Gilbert and Arave (1986), eight heifers failed to tell red from green in the first trial, and three of them did in a repeat trial. The cone model and these tests do not fully agree. We read only the summaries (abstracts) of both studies, which tested calves and heifers, not bulls.
Are cows color blind?
Not in the sense of seeing only gray. Cows have two cone types and the basis for dichromatic color vision, similar in make-up to a common type of red-green color blindness in people.
Do goats and sheep see color the same way?
Much the same: the same study found two cone types in goats and sheep too, with peaks in the same ranges as cattle. This page uses the cattle numbers for the chart and simulator.
Is the simulator exact?
No. It is computed from two cone peaks that are the middle of ranges, not single measured values, with pigment curves from a template and without the eye's lens. Showing the two cone signals as yellows and blues is a convention borrowed from simulations of people with two cones; what a cow experiences cannot be checked. The blur comes from one small study of three bulls and assumes the picture is about 70° wide. Motion is not simulated.

Sources

  1. Jacobs G. H., Deegan J. F., Neitz J. (1998). Photopigment basis for dichromatic color vision in cows, goats, and sheep. Visual Neuroscience 15(3), 581–584. DOI
  2. Rehkämper G., Görlach A. (1998). Visual identification of small sizes by adult dairy bulls. Journal of Dairy Science 81(6), 1574–1580. Acuity value read in the abstract only. DOI
  3. Adamczyk K., Herbut P., Godyń D., Angrecka S., Kupczyński R., Vieira F. M. C. (2024). Effect of light on dairy cattle in farm conditions – a review. Annals of Animal Science 24(4), 1139–1151. DOI
  4. Phillips C. J. C., Lomas C. A. (2001). The perception of color by cattle and its influence on behavior. Journal of Dairy Science 84(4), 807–813. Read in the abstract only. DOI
  5. Gilbert B. J., Arave C. W. (1986). Ability of cattle to distinguish among different wavelengths of light. Journal of Dairy Science 69(3), 825–832. Read in the abstract only. DOI
  6. Bowmaker J. K., Dartnall H. J. A. (1980). Visual pigments of rods and cones in a human retina. Journal of Physiology 298, 501–511. DOI
  7. Viénot F., Brettel H., Mollon J. D. (1999). Digital video colourmaps for checking the legibility of displays by dichromats. Color Research & Application 24(4), 243–252. DOI
  8. Govardovskii V. I., Fyhrquist N., Reuter T., Kuzmin D. G., Donner K. (2000). In search of the visual pigment template. Visual Neuroscience 17(4), 509–528. DOI
  9. spectral.js: Kubelka-Munk paint mixing in JavaScript (MIT licence). Link
  10. International Commission on Illumination (CIE). CIE standard illuminant D65 (dataset); values used every 10 nm from 380 to 750 nm. DOI
  11. Caves E. M., Johnsen S. (2018). AcuityView: an R package for portraying the effects of visual acuity on scenes observed by an animal. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9(3), 793–797. Method read in the package source (R/AcuityView.R), not in the paper. DOI
  12. Apple. iPhone 16 technical specifications: 48MP Fusion main camera, 26 mm (35 mm-equivalent focal length), which is about 69° across the long side of a 3:2 frame. Link